Narrowing the definition of autism won’t diminish its challenges or alter the fact that an extraordinary number of children are being born with difficulties in communicating and socializing and prone to repetitive behaviors. It will, however, make finding and affording support services more difficult for parents and provide some vindication to those who suspect that autism numbers have more to do with increased diagnosis than environmental toxins. And most unfortunate, it comes at a time when environmental causes for autism are finally being taken seriously.
In 2010, when creating a new draft of the fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, researchers decided Asperger’s Syndrome, or high-functioning autism, belonged in the autism category. While the distinctions between high-functioning autism and severe autism can be profound—the former can function independently and may display genius-level intellects, the latter may require assistance for the most basic daily tasks—the underlying obstacles are the same. Whether self-sufficient or wholly dependent, these individuals have difficulties related to social interaction and communication in addition to a host of other potential signifiers, from repeating daily tasks, to lining up objects, to obsessive interest in a single subject, to hand flapping.
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) defined it best. But as the new D.S.M. nears completion, Asperger’s and autism appear likely to be teased apart. Continue reading









